THE RESEARCH ONION APPLIED: A LAYERED METHODOLOGY FOR A DOCTORAL CASE-STUDY PROGRAM

This article presents a hands‑on use of the Research Onion and argues that it is more than a pedagogical sketch: it is a decision grammar for research design. I first condense the Onion’s layers – research philosophy, theory‑building approach, method choice, strategy, time horizon, and techniques – into an actionable map. I then show, step by step, how these choices were implemented in a doctoral study that examines recurring management‑control patterns in firms located in Adizes’ Prime lifecycle stage. Throughout, the emphasis is on coherence: each layer must make sense on its own and, crucially, align with the others. The contribution is twofold. Substantively, the paper documents a replicable decision pathway that yields a defensible qualitative multi‑case design with abductive reasoning, cross‑sectional timing and interview/document‑based. Methodologically, the article demonstrates how explicit assumptions and quality safeguards (credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability) can be integrated as design features rather than after‑the‑fact justifications. The result is a transparent blueprint that other scholars can adapt to related management and accounting questions while preserving sensitivity to context and use‑in‑practice.

XIII. ÉVFOLYAM 2025. SPECIAL ISSUES 2. 72-74

DOI: 10.24387/CI.SI.2025.2.12

A cikk megtekinthető: http://controllerinfo.hu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/CI_különszám_2025_2_12.pdf

REFERENCES

ADIZES, I. (2004): Managing Corporate Lifecycles. Santa Barbara, CA: Adizes Institute. SBN, 0937120065, 9780937120064.

BRAUN, V. – CLARKE, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

EISENHARDT, K. M. (1989): Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

GIOIA, D. A. – CORLEY, K. G. & HAMILTON, A. L. (2013): Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

GLASER, B. G. – STRAUSS, A. L. (1967): The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine. ISBN 0-202-30260-1

KVALE, S. – BRINKMANN, S. (2015): Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN 978-1-4522-7572-7

LINCOLN, Y. S. – GUBA, E. G. (1985): Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

MAXWELL, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-8119-4

MILES, M. B. – HUBERMAN, A. M. – SALDAÑA, J. (2019): Qualitative Data Analysis (4th ed.). Sage.

SAUNDERS, M. – LEWIS, P. – THORNHILL, A. (2016): Research Methods for Business Students (7th ed.). Pearson. ISBN, 1292121947,

STAKE, R. E. (1995): The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.

TRACY, S. J. (2010): Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big‑tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. DOI:10.1177/1077800410383121

YIN, R. K. (2018): Case Study Research and Applications (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 9781506336169