The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated remote work adoption, reshaping work-life dynamics. This study examines its effects on employees’ work-life balance through social, psychological, economic, and long-term productivity factors. Using a mixed-methods approach, 150 employees from 20 countries completed structured questionnaires, and 16 participants were interviewed. Quantitative analysis, including linear regression and ANOVA, showed all four components positively influence work-life balance, with social factors having the strongest effect. Qualitative findings highlighted flexible schedules, technological infrastructure, virtual collaboration, and career development resources, alongside challenges such as reduced social interaction. In conclusion, it is indicated that well-supported remote work arrangements enhance well-being, productivity, and professional growth, offering practical insights for organizational policy and a foundation for future research on sustainable work-life integration in digital environments.
XIII. ÉVFOLYAM 2025. SPECIAL ISSUES 2. 59-64
DOI: 10.24387/CI.SI.2025.2.10
A cikk megtekinthető: http://controllerinfo.hu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/CI_különszám_2025_2_10.pdf
REFERENCES
ATCHISON CHRISTINA, J. – LEIGH, B. – CHARLOTTE, V. – ROZLYN, R. – PHILIPPA, P. – EATON JEFFREY, W. & HELEN, W. (2020): Perceptions and behavioural responses of the general public during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of UK Adults. medRxiv.
BAGGER, J. & LI, A. (2014): How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of management, 40(4), 1123-1150.
BARRERO, J. M. – BLOOM, N. & DAVIS, S. J. (2021): Why working from home will stick.
BARUCH, Y. (2001): The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research. International journal of management reviews, 3(2), 113-129.
BOUZIRI, H. – SMITH, D. R. – DESCATHA, A. – DAB, W. & JEAN, K. (2020): Working from home in the time of COVID-19: how to best preserve occupational health? Occupational and environmental medicine, 77(7), 509-510.
CHANG, Y. – CHIEN, C. & SHEN, L.-F. (2021): Telecommuting during the coronavirus pandemic: Future time orientation as a mediator between proactive coping and perceived work productivity in two cultural samples. Personality and individual differences, 171, 110508.
CHAO, M.-C. – JOU, R.-C. – LIAO, C.-C. & KUO, C.-W. (2015): Workplace stress, job satisfaction, job performance, and turnover intention of health care workers in rural Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), NP1827-NP1836.
CHUNG, H. (2018): Future Of Work And Flexible Working In Estonia. The case of employee friendly flexibility. Tallin: Arenguseire Keskus.
CHUNG, H. & VAN DER LIPPE, T. (2020): Flexible working, work–life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365-381.
CLARK, A. E. (1996): Job satisfaction in Britain. British journal of industrial relations, 34(2), 189-217.
ÇOBAN, S. (2022): Gender and telework: Work and family experiences of teleworking professional, middle‐class, married women with children during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Turkey. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(1), 241-255.
COLLINS, C. – LANDIVAR, L. C. – RUPPANNER, L. & SCARBOROUGH, W. J. (2021): COVID‐19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 101-112.
CONTRERAS, F. – BAYKAL, E. & ABID, G. (2020): E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: What we know and where do we go. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 590271.
DINGEL, J. I. & NEIMAN, B. (2020): How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of public economics, 189, 104235.
FELSTEAD, A. & HENSEKE, G. (2017): Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance. New technology, work and employment, 32(3), 195-212.
FIGUEROA, J. F. – WADHERA, R. K. – MEHTSUN, W. T. – RILEY, K. – PHELAN, J. & JHA, A. K. (2021): Association of race, ethnicity, and community-level factors with COVID-19 cases and deaths across US counties. Healthcare.
FONNER, K. L. & ROLOFF, M. E. (2010): Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336-361.
GAJENDRAN, R. S. & HARRISON, D. A. (2007): The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of applied psychology, 92(6), 1524.
GÁLVEZ, A. – TIRADO, F. & ALCARAZ, J. M. (2020): “Oh! Teleworking!” Regimes of engagement and the lived experience of female Spanish teleworkers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(1), 180-192.
HAMMER, L. B. – KOSSEK, E. E. – YRAGUI, N. L. – BODNER, T. E. & HANSON, G. C. (2009): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of management, 35(4), 837-856.
HANDY, S. L. & MOKHTARIAN, P. L. (1996): The future of telecommuting. Futures, 28(3), 227-240.
HILBRECHT, M. – SHAW, S. M. – JOHNSON, L. C. & ANDREY, J. (2008): ‘I’m home for the kids’: contradictory implications for work–life balance of teleworking mothers. Gender, Work & Organization, 15(5), 454-476.
HRUBY, A. & HU, F. B. (2015): The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics, 33, 673-689.
IPSEN, C. – VAN VELDHOVEN, M. – KIRCHNER, K. & HANSEN, J. P. (2021): Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(4), 1826.
ISLAM, A. (2020): ‘It gets really boring if you stay at home’: Women, work and temporalities in urban India. Sociology, 54(5), 867-882.
ISLAM, A. (2021): “Two hours extra for working from home”: Reporting on gender, space, and time from the Covid‐field of Delhi, India. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 405-414.
ISLAM, A. (2022): Work-from/at/for-home: CoVID-19 and the future of work–A critical review. Geoforum, 128, 33-36.
JACKSON, L. T. & FRANSMAN, E. I. (2018): Flexi work, financial well-being, work–life balance and their effects on subjective experiences of productivity and job satisfaction of females in an institution of higher learning. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1-13.
KHALIFA, M. & DAVISON, R. (2000): Exploring the telecommuting paradox. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 29-31.
KIM, J. – HENLY, J. R. – GOLDEN, L. M. & LAMBERT, S. J. (2020): Workplace flexibility and worker well‐being by gender. Journal of marriage and family, 82(3), 892-910.
KO, E. J. & KIM, S. S. (2018): Intention to use flexible work arrangements: The case of workers in Korea and gender differences in motivation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(7), 1438-1460.
KOSSEK, E. & LAUTSCH, B. (2012): Work-family boundary management styles in organizations: A cross-level model. Organizational Psychology Review, 2 (2), 152-171. Google Scholar Google Scholar Cross Ref Cross Ref.
KUROWSKA, A. (2020): Gendered effects of home-based work on parents’ capability to balance work with non-work: Two countries with different models of division of labour compared. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 405-425.
MICAELA, B. (2020): Telework in the EU before and after the COVID-19: where we were, where we head to Headlines.
MOKHTARIAN, P. L. (1998): A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel. Urban studies, 35(2), 215-241.
MOKHTARIAN, P. L. – SALOMON, I. & CHOO, S. (2005): Measuring the measurable: Why can’t we agree on the number of telecommuters in the US? Quality and Quantity, 39, 423-452.
NAKROŠIENĖ, A. – BUČIŪNIENĖ, I. & GOŠTAUTAITĖ, B. (2019): Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International journal of manpower, 40(1), 87-101.
NILLES, J. M. (1997): Telework: enabling distributed organizations: implications for IT managers. Information Systems Management, 14(4), 7-14.
ROFCANIN, Y. – LAS HERAS, M. – ESCRIBANO, P. I. & STANKO, T. (2020): FSSBs and elderly care: Exploring the role of organizational context on employees’ overall health and work–family balance satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 403-419.
SAMANTROY, E. (2019): The invisible workers: capturing home-based work in India. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 4(2), 181-208.
SCHWARTZ, N. D. & MARCOS, C. M. (2021): Return to office hits a snag: Young resisters. New York Times.
SULLIVAN, C. & LEWIS, S. (2001): Home‐based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co‐residents. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 123-145.
THULIN, E. – VILHELMSON, B. & JOHANSSON, M. (2019): New telework, time pressure, and time use control in everyday life. Sustainability, 11(11), 3067.
VAN MEEL, J. (2011): The origins of new ways of working: Office concepts in the 1970s. Facilities, 29(9/10), 357-367.
VIRICK, M. – DASILVA, N. & ARRINGTON, K. (2010): Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: the role of performance outcome orientation and worker type. Human Relations, 63(1), 137-154.
WILLIAMS, N. (2021): How COVID-19 has impacted on ways of working. Occupational Medicine, 71(1), 40-40.
WOJČÁK, E. & BARÁTH, M. (2017): National culture and application of telework in Europe. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 3(1), 65-74.
