This study explores the relationship between technostress and leadership style. Technostress is the mental strain caused by excessive use of digital tools, which negatively affects employee well-being and performance. The research shows that supportive, transformational, and change-oriented leadership styles help reduce stress, while authoritarian, destructive or passive (laissez-faire) leadership increases it. Leaders can mitigate stress through role modeling, technical support, gradual technology implementation, and open communication. A supportive organizational culture acts as a protective factor, while technostress – especially techno-invasion, overload, and complexity – intensifies work–family conflicts. The thesis also offers practical recommendations for leaders to support successful adaptation to digital environments.
XIII. ÉVFOLYAM 2025. SPECIAL ISSUES 2. 20-24
DOI: 10.24387/CI.SI.2025.2.4
A cikk megtekinthető: http://controllerinfo.hu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/CI_különszám_2025_2_04.pdf
REFERENCES
ALPHONSE, I. – DUPONT, C. – PERRINE, F. & SCOYEZ, S. (2018): Sensitivity of directors to workplace wellbeing and risk management, Evidence from small and medium enterprises in Belgium Global Journal of Business Research, 12(1). 79–92., DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3210934
BAKACSI, Gy. (2004): Szervezeti magatartás és vezetés (pp. 185–205). Budapest, Aula Kiadó. ISBN 963 9585 49 1
BOYER-DAVIS, S. (2018): The relationship between technology stress and leadership style: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 8(1), 48-65. ISSN 2152-8411
BROD, C. (1982): Managing technostress: optimizing the use of computer technology. Personnel J 61:753–757
C. FIESELER – S. GRUBENMANN – M. MECKEL and S. MÜLLER (2014): The Leadership Dimension of Coping with Technostress 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2014, pp. 530-539, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.73.
CALIFF, C.B. & SARKER, S. (2020): A Mixed-Methods Study of Healthcare IT, MIS Quarterly44(2), 809-856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818
ÇICEK, B. & KILINC, E. (2021): Can transformational leadership eliminate the negativity of technostress? Insights from the logistics industry. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(1), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v9i1.1770
DAUD, N. M. (2025): From innovation to stress: analyzing hybrid technology adoption and its role in technostress among students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1-21., DOI: 10.1186/s41239-025-00529-x
DRAGANO, N. & LUNAU, T. (2020): Technostress at work and mental health: concepts and research results. Current opinion in psychiatry, 33(4), 407-413., DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000613
KLEIN, S. (2002): Vezetés- és szervezetpszichológia. SHL Kiadó. ISSN: 1418-6586
KÖRNER, U. – MÜLLER-THUR, K. – LUNAU, T. – DRAGONO, N. – ANGERER, P. & BUCHNER, A. (2019): Perceived stress in human-machine interaction in modern manufacturing environments-Results of a qualitative interview study. Stress Health, 35, 187–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2853
NORTHOUSE, PG (2019): Leadership: theory and practice. SAGE, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singa. ISBN: 978-1-5443-2644-3
RADEMAKER, T. (2025): Technostress and Work-Family Conflict: The Moderating Role of Laissez-Faire Leadership. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5235998
RADEMAKER, T. – KLINGENBERG, I. & SÜß, S. (2023): Leadership and technostress: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00385-x
RAGU-NATHAN, T. S. – TARAFDAR, M. – RAGU-NATHAN, B. S. & TU, Q. (2008): The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1070.0165
ROHWER, E. – FLÖTHER, J.C. – HARTH, V. & MACHE, S. (2022): Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, 3625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063625
SCHMIDT, M. – FRANK, L. & GIMPEL, H. (2021): How Adolescents Cope with Technostress: A Mixed-Methods Approach, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25(2), 154-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2021.1887696
STADIN, M. – NORDIN, M. – BROSTROM, A. – HANSON, LLM. – WESTERLUND, H. – FRANSSON, EI. (2016): Information and communication technology demands at work: the association with job strain, effort-reward imbalance and self-rated health in different socio-economic strata. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-016-1140-8
STADIN, M. – NORDIN, M. – BROSTRÖM, A. – LINDA, L. – HANSON, M. – WESTERLUND, H. & FRANSSON, E.I. (2019): Repeated exposure to high ICT demands at work, and development of suboptimal self-rated health: findings from a 4-year follow-up of the SLOSH study. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01407-6
SZABOLCSI, S. (2016): Vezetési stílusok egykor és most. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 1-16., https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2016.1.41.
TUREL, O. & GAUDIOSO, F. (2018): Techno-stressors, distress and strain: The roles of leadership and competitive climates. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0461-7
XIAOXIONG, F. (2024): Leadership Style. In: Kan, Z. (eds) The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7874-4_1226
YENER, S. – ARSLAN, A. & BELCHIOR-ROCHA, H. (2024): Leadership strategies for managing technostress. In Darrell Norman Burrell (Ed.), Leadership action and intervention in health, business, education, and technology. (pp. 115-127).: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693- 4288-6
